(November 28, 2018 at 9:35 pm)Everena Wrote: I think if a species mates in a consious manner, and has a penis that it injects a female with, it is conscious.
That's a fascinating definition. I think I begin to see why you think "microtubules" are involved.
Your definition is lovingly circular. A species must be conscious in order to mate "in a conscious manner" and if it mates "in a conscious manner" then clearly it is conscious. But what makes you think that barnacles do anything other than blindly follow instinct? It isn't as if the have a lot to work with in terms of brains.
Perhaps you'd be better served with a definition than some arbitrary criteria cobbled together.
(November 28, 2018 at 9:56 pm)Everena Wrote: If you don't think science can someday prove intelligent design, then you are the one who does not understand science.
I know that ID's tenets are unfalsifiable, which means that it is not and cannot be regarded as science.
Quote:I understand the words. I also understand that you have provided nothing that explains how the complexity of DNA could come about without an intelligent driving force. The big rock in your front yard did not create DNA. No matter what you think can arise from an inanimate object, it is literally not possible or logical in any way. And you obviously have no argument of your own.
Then explain to me what complexity means.