DNA Proves Existence of a Designer

[Amarok]

I think if a species mates in a consious manner, and has a penis that it injects a female with, it is conscious.

That's a fascinating definition. I think I begin to see why you think "microtubules" are involved.

Your definition is lovingly circular. A species must be conscious in order to mate "in a conscious manner" and if it mates "in a conscious manner" then clearly it is conscious. But what makes you think that barnacles do anything other than blindly follow instinct? It isn't as if the have a lot to work with in terms of brains.

Perhaps you'd be better served with a definition than some arbitrary criteria cobbled together.

If you don't think science can someday prove intelligent design, then you are the one who does not understand science.

I know that ID's tenets are unfalsifiable, which means that it is not and cannot be regarded as science.

I understand the words. I also understand that you have provided nothing that explains how the complexity of DNA could come about without an intelligent driving force. The big rock in your front yard did not create DNA. No matter what you think can arise from an inanimate object, it is literally not possible or logical in any way. And you obviously have no argument of your own.

Then explain to me what complexity means.

Her definitions of conscientiousness is one of convenience
Her definition of complex is also one of convenience

---

I'm sure Bucky will be along shortly to repost a plethora of your gaffs.

I'm still trying to figure out which scientific journal to write to and publish Everena's totally amazing discovery ....
.... that you can tell whether something is a plant or fungus or another classification simply by going to the supermarket and looking to see what department it's in.  
Who'd a thunk it ?
Maybe there's a Journal of Woo-ology.

But you have to convince her of that .....

Remember to be "specific" or she will assert you can't because that logically follows....