(November 30, 2018 at 3:41 am)Gwaithmir Wrote:(November 29, 2018 at 3:26 pm)Everena Wrote: I am asking a few of you this question because I would like to know the argument that has you all so convinced.
So please take me to the argument that convinced you that complexity could spontaneously occur from simplicity. I don't care if you use your own words, or someone else's, but what argument is it that has you so convinced this could all come to be without an intelligent creator?
Here's an article on the probability of abiogenesis. There are dozens of links and references to follow. If you are an intellectually honest person, you will follow the evidence to a rational conclusion without preconceived biases. In other words, you will read the articles with the idea of understanding them.
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/abioprob/abioprob.html
I've already read all about A Bio Genesis. An intelligent creator would stlll definitely be required, because their only theory of how life came to be is that it "just all happened naturally dude" That is vague and it means nothing. Also, abiogenesis has been criticisized and refuted by numerous scientists, just so you know.
1. They did not re-create the correct environment for the time period this would have happened in the Miller-Urey research experiments.
2. Proteins don't bind under water, in fact they do just the opposite.
3. Louis Pasteur's 1859 experiment is widely seen as having settled the question of spontaneous generation and disproved abiogenesis. He boiled a meat broth in a flask that had a long neck that curved downward, like that of a goose or swan.
And there is a lot more reading you should do about this unproven hypothesis you are so convinced by, because no one in the science community really seems convinced