DNA Proves Existence of a Designer

[Amarok]

But my question was what convinces you that an intelligent creator wasn't necessary "It just all happened naturally dude" is not all that convincing so I do not see how you can be convinced by it.

What convinces me is the preponderance of evidence favoring a number of viable abiogenesis hypotheses. The fact that these are viable hypotheses negates any need for an intelligent creator. The fact that this evidence is not convincing to you is not my problem.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abiogenesis
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/abioprob/abioprob.html
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/abioprob/borelfaq.html

She will just gish's gallop a bunch of stuff from a creationist webshite that willl be scientist who study Abiogenisis and accept and try and pain it as though their debunking it .