DNA Proves Existence of a Designer

[Anomalocaris]

How comes Everena and CDF have the same nonsensical objections to evolution, while having, allegedly, completely different nonsensical religious beleifs otherwise?
How comes that Everena joined the one and only thread CDF participates in?
How comes that CDF didnt actively participate much as long as Everena argued, and now that Everena is banned, CDF is regurgitating all the same BS? If it wasnt his name on top of those posts, it just as well could be Everena.

Because there is no actual material factual basis whatsoever underlying creationism,  therefore there is no objective reality against which to measure whether whether one proposition uttered in support of creationism is more sound or has more factual basis than another.   So creationists always feel free to borrow whatever bullshit that seems  more rethorically effective. Hence CDF readily swallow Everena’s bullshit.

Since it takes a strong tendency of biasing towards embracing what sounds good subjectively and away from what actually is objectively to be a creationists, creationists also readily confuse rethorics that sound effective to their individual ears with that which might actually be more effective in serving the purpose they pursue. So CDF also readily regurgitates everena’s bullshit.

Even if one has never read about evolution, and one has never followed the debate, to the intelligent and astute observer, one fact instantly differentiates creationists from evolution scientists and make it clear which speaks from evidence which which purely from rethorics.

That fact is evolution scientists often admit without prompting from the other side that they had been wrong about a particular fact, observation, or theory about mechanism used to support or flesh out the theory evolution.   This is because their objective is to find reality, so they actively observe reality and use what they see to measure and validate their understanding and their model of reality.

Creationists almost never actively admit they had been wrong about some fact or basis for creationism without pressure from outside.  Only when the whole educated world has seen that some of their facts and basis were counterfactualand apply pressure so they sometimes vastly begrudgingly back away from some claims without ever admitting they had been wrong, In most cases they don;t back away cleanly even then.   This is because they would like reality to be so, but has no interest in seeking what reality actually is, and thus has no inclination to actually actively observe reality to validate their understand against reality.