DNA Proves Existence of a Designer

[CDF47]

Do you have a quick and specific question?

Sure, if the facts are as documented in the article you quoted, why bring up irreducible complexity at all?  Even your own author says it's of no use to intelligent design.

All i care about in that article I posted was the definition.  I don't care about anything else in that article.  Irreducible complexity is of use to intelligent design.  These molecular machines are so complex and specified that if one part of a machine fails the entire system fails.  I am sure they have redundancies built in but the point is these machines are designed for sure.

---

Poor NeverAgaina dropped just shy of the big 1k mark. We tried to warn her there was no lasting power in microtubules.

She was amusing no doubt 

Using Atheist Roger Penrose to supposedly refute atheists 

Using Evolution supporting scientists to supposedly refute the theory which would the two of them famous  . Because she latched onto some sentences that supposedly support Creationism. Then spinning some yarn about scientists having to use evolution though supposedly it refuted it .  

Using people studying Abiogenisis to say it's been refuted

She was a good poster.  Sucks she got banned.  I wonder what she did to get banned.  If a moderator sees this if they could PM me I would appreciate it?  It must have been posting those videos but she stopped when she was told to.