DNA Proves Existence of a Designer

[CDF47]

An argument against the existence of CDFGod god by way of intelligent design.

First, my definition.

Intelligence is a force, F, that acts so as to maximize future freedom of action. It acts to maximize future freedom of action, or keep options open, with some strength T, with the diversity of possible accessible futures, S up to some future time horizon, τ.

F = T ∇ S

Here are my assumptions.  


1. Design is only explicable in terms of intelligence.

2. We are designed.

3. CDFgod is asserted to be the existent intelligence(1) responsible for our design(2).

4. A necessary property of CDFgod's existence (3) is that our design (2) is explained by it's intelligence (1)

Here are my assertions.  Evolutionary processes are just such a force F.  They act to maximize future freedom of action, or keep options open, with the strength T of replication, and the diversity of possible accessible futures S of modification, up to the future time horizon t in which no further evolutionary processes are possible.  

Now, my inference.  Because we have been designed, and because the intelligence responsible for that design is evolutionary process, our design is explained by an intelligence other than CDFgods....ergo it lacks a necessary property of it's existence, and so...does not exist.  

The Lord used some evolutionary processes but not common ancestry.  That is the problem with your equation.

---

She was a good poster.  Sucks she got banned.  I wonder what she did to get banned.  If a moderator sees this if they could PM me I would appreciate it?  It must have been posting those videos but she stopped when she was told to.

She was a psychiatric case, but no one who hears of miracle of Christianity would surprised by Christians seeking validation in mental illness.

She was not.  It is not funny to laugh at psychiatric patients as well. 

---

I wasn't really following this thread, but I thought her banning was odd.  I suppose one doesn't have to be causing any harm to be trolling, but what I saw of her, she operated on the borderline, pretty much kept to this one thread, and was insulting but not solely insulting.  I don't have access to the staff's deliberations, but given what little I know, I wouldn't have voted to take disciplinary action, or would have advocated a less severe disciplinary action.  But then, I've been ignoring this thread for some time.  I may not have all the facts.  Matter of fact, I'm sure I don't have all the facts.  Troll or not, she seemed harmless enough, and people liked to engage with her.

That's great to hear from you.  Yeah, I don't think she was that bad in this thread either.  At one point she posted a bunch of videos to get to 1000 pages quicker and someone called it spamming.  Not sure if that is what it was about or not.