First order logic, set theory and God

[Rahn127]

I presented my objections to each part and gave examples that show each part is flawed.

In the car scenario, he uses the car as an example purposely. A car is designed with certain finite precise parts that do not change over time. A car is not grown. It doesn't form from a set of natural conditions.

It is not natural.

Nature and reality behave in ways that are not so neat and clean. Everything in nature is constantly changing and yet we still label things as the same thing even when they've changed.

The sun, our Galaxy, the universe is constantly changing. Heavy metals form within stars, but it doesn't happen immediately. A star is born through gravity and matter. Conditions over time produce new heavy elements and at the same time, helium is used up and eventually you have a star with no more fuel.

The energy of the universe is dynamic and always changing. If something is always changing and it exists now then it has always existed and causation is meaningless when referring to something that has always existed.