(December 6, 2018 at 8:36 pm)tackattack Wrote: A limited curator to ensure she's medically compliant, would shield her from legal culpability, give her a witness in case some evil thing happened again (or didn't), be there to help her healthily cope with the fallout of a slander suit. Especially if she's ineligible to work and receiving state support for just breathing, it should come with strings. Nothing in life is free for anyone else, why should it be for her.
I have an idea.
In Belgium , it is possible for the person to be cured not voluntary without being in an asylum conformally to articles 23 to 29 of Law on the protection of the person of the mentally ill.
The French name of this Law is "Loi relative à la protection de la personne des malades mentaux" ( http://www.ejustice.just.fgov.be/cgi_loi...e_name=loi ) and its Dutch name is "Wet betreffende de bescherming van de persoon van de geesteszieke." ( http://www.ejustice.just.fgov.be/cgi_loi...e_name=wet ).
This law passed in "Tuesday, June 26, 1990" and in force since "Saturday, July 27, 1991" and the last modifications passed in "Monday, February 20, 2017" and in force since "Saturday, April 01 , 2017".
But if we follow my idea it won't be a shield for legal culpability for her.
Civil capacity and penal (Criminal) culpability are not the same things in the judicial system of Belgium and others countries like France.
But you can be renown non penally responsible or partially if you have a mental issue nor fully responsible if your mental issue didn't affect you at the time accorded to the psychiatrist(s).
But there are a problem if we follow my idea or not. Anybody can made a request to prosecutor of the king (Français : Procureur du Roi , Dutch : procureur des Konings , German : Prokurator des Königs) to appoint her a curator or transfer her to an asylym.
Therefore we must hope she will be treated by skilled and just people.
