DNA Proves Existence of a Designer

[sdelsolray]

He is trained in fields of science unrelated to biology or biochemistry in a Christian “university”, who has since made it clear he is no scientist at all, but the sort of creationist hack expected form Christian “universities”, by using a PhD, again in field unrelated to biology or biochemistry, as pseudo cock feather to impress idiots like you to push pseudoscientific bullshit to advocate discredited religious world view, instead of doing real scientific work in fields in which he at least has qualification.

This is a terrible argument.  Cherry picking scientists who only say what you want them to say wouldn't be scientific. That's why we have peer review.   If someone shares scientific work, that is the standard they are held by regardless of religion, ideology, or worldview.  As soon as you start adding unnecessary bias, then you begin floating out of the realm of scientific study.

Have your read Stephen Myer's books? They are not peer reviewed, nor are they "scientific work". Yes, adding unnecessary bias is not desirable, as is writing about something you have never read.