RE: First order logic, set theory and God
December 7, 2018 at 9:54 pm
(This post was last modified: December 7, 2018 at 9:55 pm by Bucky Ball.)
(December 7, 2018 at 9:49 pm)T0 Th3 M4X Wrote:(December 7, 2018 at 9:36 pm)Bucky Ball Wrote: .... seriously. That's a horseshit rebuttal ... you can't even say why ?
I explained. If you didn't understand, that may be an indication that you should take some time to study logic, including commonly committed fallacies. Sometimes it's hard not to make a fallacy, so it's good to know them. Admittedly I make them on occasion, but try to go back and fix them when I do. Good stuff.
No you didn't. Your BS is irrelevant.
".You can't control all variables in the universe simultaneously, and suggesting he need to form conclusions about them are self-defeating to your argument, because you must immediately disqualify your argument by not defining them and showing how they must be significant to his equation. If he has to do it, why should
n't you follow your own standard of accountability? Even if you were correct, it doesn't invalid his entire position. It just means you need to add more variables to clarify it."
I demonstrated why his variable DO NOT APPLY AT ALL to the conditions. He knows NOTHING ABOUT ANY conditions outside the universe. You bluster well, old man with this fallacy BS, but in fact you refuted nothing.
In fact it's a lack of understanding of Logic of BOTH of you that reeks here.
Your patronizing shit is dismissed for what it is, pops.
Every religion is true one way or another. It is true when understood metaphorically. But when it gets stuck in its own metaphors, interpreting them as facts, then you are in trouble. - Joseph Campbell
Militant Atheist Commie Evolutionist
Militant Atheist Commie Evolutionist