DNA Proves Existence of a Designer

[CDF47]

He is a brilliant scientist with a PhD from Cambridge.  He is none of things you label him as.

Really?

What was his major in his Christian “university”?

What field of science was it in which he was gainfully employed?

What was his PhD in?

Does any of this give him qualification to speak about biology, genetics, origin of life?

No?

Then What motivated him to presume authoratativeness despite his lack of qualification and related professional accomplishemmet, using totally unrelated PhD as camouflage?  Ah, yes, his matriculation from a Christian establishement of higher “learning” offers a clue.

He studied the philosophy of science to earn a PhD from Cambridge university.  He has a lot of knowledge about genetics and biology.

---

I’m still waiting for CDF to explain why he thinks simple organisms with short life spans can speciate, but larger and more complex organisms can’t.

They just simply don't.

---

Dr. Stephen C. Meyer disputes it as one scientist.

I have read and studied two of Meyer's books, Signature in the Cell and Darwin's Doubt, as well of some of his other writings.

His arguments are laced with the same logical fallacies and misrepresentations from his Discovery Institute Masters, most commonly the argument from incredulity (one of your favorites), the mere assertion (your absolute favorite), the strawman fallacy, among others, rending them ineffective and unconvincing.  He does not write like a scientist.  He writes like a person with a personal agenda who pretends to be a scientist.  And that agenda is a religious agenda.  As is typical of militant Abrahamic creationists on a salary, he complains (again, using fallacious reasoning) about established science, but only against science which conflicts with his religious beliefs.  He offers no alternative, except for goddidit.  He lies.  He misrepresents.  He conflates.  He pretends to be all "sciency".  He repeats previously refuted words strings (such as specified complex information) without scientific definitions or any suggestion on how to measure or test them.

He pretends to present science, which is only designed to convince gullible theists such as yourself.  He succeeds, and you are a classic example.

Basically, Meyer is a disingenuous and lying whore for the Discovery Institute.  And you are a gullible acolyte of this lying whore for the Discovery Institute.

Your continued reliance on his nonsense, and the nonsense from similar imposters and con men, explains much.

Now tell me how you really feel about him...LOL