DNA Proves Existence of a Designer

[CDF47]

This is a terrible argument.  Cherry picking scientists who only say what you want them to say wouldn't be scientific. That's why we have peer review.   If someone shares scientific work, that is the standard they are held by regardless of religion, ideology, or worldview.  As soon as you start adding unnecessary bias, then you begin floating out of the realm of scientific study.

Have your read Stephen Myer's books?  They are not peer reviewed, nor are they "scientific work".  Yes, adding unnecessary bias is not desirable, as is writing about something you have never read.

I have heard him speak for many hours.