DNA Proves Existence of a Designer

[T0 Th3 M4X]

And this is when I say - Derp!

You greatly overestimate yourself my solipsist friend.

Do you want to know why I like math? Maybe not, but here it is anyway.

It could give a flip about your feelings or my feelings.  It cares about solving problems through numerical values.  That's it. I can be mad at it, tell it that it's stupid, refer to it as "my solipsist friend", or whatever I want to say about it.  It won't listen to a word I say, it doesn't care to, it doesn't need to.  It's simply there to do what it's supposed to do.

Additionally when you try to invalidate someone as a scientist or from a particular study because it's a different field, then you're missing the whole point of scientific study. I have a degree, but only in two scientific fields, but it doesn't limit me to those fields.  Actually it might make me relevant to a study in a different field because I can help isolate variables based on my fields of study. The requirements don't change. At the end of the day, myself and whoever I'm working with just need to follow the same scientific standards.  If we miss something, no problem.  Trial and error is acceptable.  It may be what is needed to set up the appropriate parameters next time, or it may help other scientists do an even better study.  That is how we we advance our knowledge. Even when we work separately, we're still contributing collectively.

---

Dr. Stephen C. Meyer disputes it as one scientist.

Stephen Meyer disputes it without evidence or expertise in the relevant fields.

Bringing up Meyer  as a counter to evolution is as stupid as me asserting I'm a better soccer player than Leo Messi.

---

Who’s the new guy?  *popcorn*

An idiot who thinks the definition of the scientific method is "accept unquestioningly everything in the bible while dismissing out of hand all evidence contradictingit".

We're talking about a man who thinks that logic puzzles so simple I was given them in primary school are only solvable by geniuses (to go from his thread spamming in the maths area).

I can speak for myself, so no need to make things up.  What you're doing is what's commonly known on the Internet as "trolling,"   For real world purposes, we also call it "slander."

- What "contradiction" did I accept?
- What supposed contradiction did I even assert?
- You're missing the point of the titles. It's meant to be a fun thing and not taken to heart.  Just like the prizes.  Is the concept if socializing and enjoying something foreign to you?  Is math not an acceptable medium to do so?

The skunk in the crowd is usually the one in the crowd crying out that everybody else is a skunk.