RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
December 8, 2018 at 9:42 am
(This post was last modified: December 8, 2018 at 9:43 am by LastPoet.)
(December 8, 2018 at 6:37 am)T0 Th3 M4X Wrote:(December 8, 2018 at 5:59 am)LastPoet Wrote: You greatly overestimate yourself my solipsist friend.
Do you want to know why I like math? Maybe not, but here it is anyway.
It could give a flip about your feelings or my feelings. It cares about solving problems through numerical values. That's it. I can be mad at it, tell it that it's stupid, refer to it as "my solipsist friend", or whatever I want to say about it. It won't listen to a word I say, it doesn't care to, it doesn't need to. It's simply there to do what it's supposed to do.
I am having a hard time undertanding your diatribe. Were you adressing someone else?
Quote:Additionally when you try to invalidate someone as a scientist or from a particular study because it's a different field, then you're missing the whole point of scientific study. I have a degree, but only in two scientific fields, but it doesn't limit me to those fields. Actually it might make me relevant to a study in a different field because I can help isolate variables based on my fields of study. The requirements don't change. At the end of the day, myself and whoever I'm working with just need to follow the same scientific standards. If we miss something, no problem. Trial and error is acceptable. It may be what is needed to set up the appropriate parameters next time, or it may help other scientists do an even better study. That is how we we advance our knowledge. Even when we work separately, we're still contributing collectively.
You do not sound like you have one. Is it a philisophy degree?
