DNA Proves Existence of a Designer

[CDF47]

It's not biased. I don't mind Christian, Muslims, atheists, or whatever.  We're just a bunch of people sharing a planet.  But no sense making things up.  We have multiple science magazines/journals with studies stating such a thing, and people saying they are wrong.  Welp, reject science then.  If you fit something by its definition, that's what you are.   It doesn't make you evil, mean, a bad person or whatever.  I'm a human.  If I go around telling everybody I'm a unicorn, then I would be full of something. That's how I see it, and if people want to differ with their view, then that's their choice, but I'm sticking to what the scientific studies are indicating.  Here's another one from The Atlantic.

Title: Atheists Are Sometimes More Religious Than Christians

It also identifies atheists, agnostics, etc... and recognizes them as the "Nones" just like National Geographic.  But I suppose someone is going to suggest they are making things up too.  Waiting for it...

 *Sigh*

  It's good/great that you don't mind all those things.
  You understand that... Just because something appears in a journal, doens't make it 'True', right?
  Something posted in a journal has;
(1) Been accepted as 'Fit to print' by said Journal.
(2) The pedigree of said Journal reflects the articles posted within.
(3) Any such publication is constantly subject to reveiw, revision, testing for rpeatabilty/consitency etc.
(4) Jounral don't determin 'Reality'. They simply post works/research that they find acceptible.

 Again, I'm finding your 'Anthropomorhic' veiw of the world coming to the fore.

Is it not interesting that you are having a conversation on a forum with many 'A'-theists and 'Non'-theists from across the world and, given such a large and eclectic sample size, you are not finding any such people who identify as such agreeing with your premises?

Me thinks your Journal referances do not well reflect reality.

Cheers.

Not at work.

---

Dr. Meyer is brilliant.  Just listen to his videos and debates.  He crushes every debate he is in.  Hands down crushes them.  It's pretty cool to see.

Uhm... no?

I've seen quite a few Google-tube posts where Dr Meyer is shown to be rather... 'Simple' (?) in his views and such?

Perhaps there are a myriad amount of such things and you'be been lucky enough to veiw the positive ones?

 But.. really, we're not talking about the fellow's Youtube prescence, are we?

We're talking about how wll educated the fellow is in the topics about which he speaks.

To whit "Not, sweet fek all, seeming." I would posit in reply.

I mean, what i would love to see. Would positivly be enamoured with. Would be something demonstratable by I.D. propoents.

Some "Here's my process from 'Hypothesis' to testing to verification to acceptance amongst said peers which becomes accepted as a 'Theory'." kind of thing.

 So far, all I ever see (Time an time and time add nausem) again is 'Evolution is wrong because reasons."

That's... not how it works. Just saying thing 'X' is wrong... does not make thing 'Y' right.

You have to show (Demonstrate etc) the why 'Y' is right. Or at least a darn good working tool that can be overlaid upon reality such that verification developed.

Not at work.

Their next phase is testing and verification of projects based on ID hypotheses.

---

Good video.  I didn't know they acted so much like a religion.  I knew they did but not to that extent.

 No, it's not a good video.

Others have already explained that said video is froma biased source and its depiction is biased.

That no one you are posting too is identifying with the images and pictures being presented shuld be telling.

What you think it was faked?  It is not the only source reporting this.