DNA Proves Existence of a Designer

[T0 Th3 M4X]

Of course you can have a "cake bible" too. Bible = Book.  So you have the "atheist bible" for atheism and the "cake bible" for making cakes.  Also, I'm not the one equating atheism to a religion.  Society is the one that has equated atheism as to being a religion.  When you evolve something into something more complex, then it has to take on that identity to explain.  If someone says "I adhere to atheism." That alone isn't enough to qualify their belief (on non-belief) since there are many different versions and attributes that could mean.

1. Accept it isn't a book of atheism it's a bunch of guys commenting on stuff and don't be disingenuous you were trying to equate these books to the Christian bible   

2.As for you second point both you and society are wrong 

3.And your third point is simply wrong

1. I didn't read it, so you could be right.  But why label it as such then if it's just random thoughts and has nothing to do with atheism?  I don't expect you to answer that, but it's just curious.

2. You don't determine society.  It's determined within the context of itself.  What it means for you to be an atheist isn't how society has to interpret it, especially as the idea becomes more complex.  If we just take one person's view and say "this is it", then we ignore the rest of people in society with have a different take on it.

3. I'm not wrong. You're wrong.  (I said that because you saying I'm wrong doesn't validate your claim more than me saying "you're wrong" validates mine.  Pointless.