(December 18, 2018 at 6:10 pm)CDF47 Wrote:He didn't need too(December 18, 2018 at 2:10 am)Gae Bolga Wrote: Already have. Did you not see the summary in the text you quoted?
That's nice...but that's not history. That's your religion.
If you say so..but we've been down this road with you in this thread before..haven't we? Magic book can tell you a town will be destroyed and never rebuilt...and a person can show you the picture of that same thriving city today..and you'll say;
"See, excellent prophecy!"
Just as, in this case, a person can comment on the political realities of the 6th century bce, get it wrong, and you'll say;
"See, Christ!"
You didn't provide much feedback in a summary on the article.
The historical Christ was detailed in that article. Christ is an historical figure. The Holy Bible claims Him to be the Son of God.
These are excellent prophecies and that was referring to Christ.
There was no historical Christ as far as the evince is concerned
And no there are not
Seek strength, not to be greater than my brother, but to fight my greatest enemy -- myself.
Inuit Proverb
Inuit Proverb