DNA Proves Existence of a Designer

[CDF47]

No, you have to believe it in the heart.  God reads the heart.  Then also confess it with your lips.  God's people are saved by accepting Jesus as Lord and Savior.  They love God and neighbor.  They are sinners but they work on it and care about it.

You still don't get it. They CAN'T believe anything they seriously believe to be total crap nonsense. They HONESTLY don't believe it. It's not like turning on a faucet.
More proof you don't get what intellectual honesty means. If your gods "read the heart", they KNOW some do not buy into the religious shit.
The Christian position is : "For it is by grace you have been saved, through faith—and this is not from yourselves, it is the gift of God—not by works, so that no one can boast." Ephesians 2:8-9
They have not been given the gift, and don't buy into your crap position about codes. Evolutionary biologists have proposed pathways for the evolution of DNA ... and YOU have never once even commented on why the proposed chemical processes could not work. You are INCOMPETENT and too ignorant of Biochemistry to even begin to discuss this subject.

No one says DNA/RNA could assemble itself ... your straw-man is such an obvious fallacy and obvious attempt to evade providing a real answer. Why ? Because you are too ignorant of chemistry to even begin discussing the topic.
You are incapable of discussing what is in this link, in detail.
https://www.news.gatech.edu/2013/12/23/n...origin-rna

The proof is in the information for the millionth time.  Everyone fails to address this adequately.  No one can explain where the information bearing properties of DNA come from.

---

"Proposed pathways", which means nothing.  He doesn't have to show isn't feasible.  You need to show that it's factual.  Why would he be responsible for it?

The pathways and research on the subject (some of it done by Nobel laureates in the filed) are posted IN THIS thread ... just because he's  too fucking lazy and ignorant to read and discuss them, doesn't relieve him (or YOU) from the responsibility of doing more than making ignorant assertions and stupid comments FAR outside the consensus in the field. Either discuss IN DETAIL what's wrong with this chemistry, or STFU. 

I'd like to see your post of Jack take on Dr. Stephen C. Meyer in a debate.  Every debate I have seen Dr. Meyer in it was a landslide win for him against atheist scientists.

---

Posterboy for the religion. CDF does more for atheists than for theists. Not that it matters, if one is satisfied with vacuous words and conjecture.

Pandering doesn't win arguments/debates.

---

You still don't get it. They CAN'T believe anything they seriously believe to be total crap nonsense. They HONESTLY don't believe it. It's not like turning on a faucet.
More proof you don't get what intellectual honesty means. If your gods "read the heart", they KNOW some do not buy into the religious shit.
The Christian position is : "For it is by grace you have been saved, through faith—and this is not from yourselves, it is the gift of God—not by works, so that no one can boast." Ephesians 2:8-9
They have not been given the gift, and don't buy into your crap position about codes. Evolutionary biologists have proposed pathways for the evolution of DNA ... and YOU have never once even commented on why the proposed chemical processes could not work. You are INCOMPETENT and too ignorant of Biochemistry to even begin to discuss this subject.

No one says DNA/RNA could assemble itself ... your straw-man is such an obvious fallacy and obvious attempt to evade providing a real answer. Why ? Because you are too ignorant of chemistry to even begin discussing the topic.
You are incapable of discussing what is in this link, in detail.
https://www.news.gatech.edu/2013/12/23/n...origin-rna

"Proposed pathways", which means nothing.  He doesn't have to show isn't feasible.  You need to show that it's factual.  Why would he be responsible for it?

That's the truth.