(December 22, 2018 at 10:16 am)T0 Th3 M4X Wrote:(December 22, 2018 at 8:46 am)LastPoet Wrote: Posterboy for the religion. CDF does more for atheists than for theists. Not that it matters, if one is satisfied with vacuous words and conjecture.
Pandering doesn't win arguments/debates.
(December 22, 2018 at 8:58 am)Bucky Ball Wrote: You still don't get it. They CAN'T believe anything they seriously believe to be total crap nonsense. They HONESTLY don't believe it. It's not like turning on a faucet.
More proof you don't get what intellectual honesty means. If your gods "read the heart", they KNOW some do not buy into the religious shit.
The Christian position is : "For it is by grace you have been saved, through faith—and this is not from yourselves, it is the gift of God—not by works, so that no one can boast." Ephesians 2:8-9
They have not been given the gift, and don't buy into your crap position about codes. Evolutionary biologists have proposed pathways for the evolution of DNA ... and YOU have never once even commented on why the proposed chemical processes could not work. You are INCOMPETENT and too ignorant of Biochemistry to even begin to discuss this subject.
No one says DNA/RNA could assemble itself ... your straw-man is such an obvious fallacy and obvious attempt to evade providing a real answer. Why ? Because you are too ignorant of chemistry to even begin discussing the topic.
You are incapable of discussing what is in this link, in detail.
https://www.news.gatech.edu/2013/12/23/n...origin-rna
"Proposed pathways", which means nothing. He doesn't have to show isn't feasible. You need to show that it's factual. Why would he be responsible for it?
I did ask you some follow up questions. Not sure if you missed my post.
Nay_Sayer: “Nothing is impossible if you dream big enough, or in this case, nothing is impossible if you use a barrel of KY Jelly and a miniature horse.”
Wiser words were never spoken.
Wiser words were never spoken.
