At work.
CDF47 constantly fails with their bizarre insistence that DNA is a 'Binary' code. When the molecule is made up of three sets of different nucleotides.
They have also failed to explain why DNA must operate in a triplet fashion as opposed to:
Dual; It would be 'simpler' and less resource intensive.
Quadruplex; it would be more robust to coding errors due to increased redundancies as well as being able to create a greater difference of amino acids (Current DNA codes for just 21 or 2
Quintuple; As well as being even more robust. This amount of coding would be able to transcribe ALL 110 known amino acids.
No explanation has been given as to why a pentose (5 sided) sugar/nucleic form is the 'Back bone' of the DNA as opposed to a Hexose (6 sided) form.
Why a carbohydrate sugar should form said chain instead of an even mord robust peptide chain.
CDF47 constantly fails with their bizarre insistence that DNA is a 'Binary' code. When the molecule is made up of three sets of different nucleotides.
They have also failed to explain why DNA must operate in a triplet fashion as opposed to:
Dual; It would be 'simpler' and less resource intensive.
Quadruplex; it would be more robust to coding errors due to increased redundancies as well as being able to create a greater difference of amino acids (Current DNA codes for just 21 or 2
Quintuple; As well as being even more robust. This amount of coding would be able to transcribe ALL 110 known amino acids.
No explanation has been given as to why a pentose (5 sided) sugar/nucleic form is the 'Back bone' of the DNA as opposed to a Hexose (6 sided) form.
Why a carbohydrate sugar should form said chain instead of an even mord robust peptide chain.
