Help me with my new website!

[FlatAssembler]

I looked at your new phoneme-game page, and its behavior and the code behind it look a lot more like what I'd expect.

There is no point in continuing developing it. It's a failure from its very beginning. I thought it would be fun to play, almost nobody finds it fun to play. I thought I've figured out some algorithm that's relatively easy to implement and that would produce relatively-convincing results, they're convincing to nobody who is into historical linguistics (and I can kind of see why, but I couldn't have seen that before I actually wrote that algorithm and spent days tweaking it). Maybe I'll have better luck next time.

Personally, I'd recommend you start working with server-side code and a database.

I don't know. I mean, the only server-side language 000webhost allows me to use is PHP, which is rather, well, strange to me (It somewhat resembles PERL).
Besides, the server works a lot faster if you just serve HTML files, rather than process them with PHP, right? 000webhost claims my site can take 300 requests per minute, but that's true for WordPress sites, right? If I simply serve unprocessed HTML files, I can serve almost unlimited requests per minute, right?

By the way, what do you guys here think, is it better to work in quirks mode or in standards mode?
I prefer working in quirks mode, because I find it easier to deal with the CSS box-model not working consistently across different browsers (also, the CSS box-model bug doesn't appear in Internet Explorer 11 and other modern browsers even in quirks mode) than having to deal with "document.body.clientHeight" and the likes working differently in various browsers (in quirks mode, they work in all browsers as in Internet Explorer 6). Also, working in quirks mode prevents Internet Explorer 9 from displaying the JavaScript-generated SVGs on my site and therefore hiding the text with them (since it doesn't correctly position them).

Also, what do you think about Facebook? Specifically, do you think its censorship of the deviant political views, such as genocide revisionism, is a good thing? I don't quite see how it can be, in fact, it seems to me it's forcing people into believing something that isn't necessarily true.
I understand that many people might get upset when I say that, for all we know, the conventional narrative of the Genocide of Vukovar may be false. I mean, it's the narrative that our country is built on, it's relatively deeply engrained into our culture, and so on. But, let's face it, the evidence that the genocide happened on the scale accepted by the mainstream history is (at least as far as I am aware) quite vague. The evidence that the Serbian president Slobodan Milosevic had something to do with that? Even more so. The evidence that the Croats were the good guys who did everything they could to prevent the genocide? Non-existent, in fact, even the BBC news noted at the time that the Croatian general Mile Dedakovic apparently let it happen, for which he, in an interview, blamed the Croatian president Franjo Tudman for not sending him enough weapons. Is it possible, if not probable, that they let it happen on purpose, or even made it happen on purpose, and then inflated the numbers and somehow made themselves seem like the good guys?
And Facebook banning me for saying that is forcing the belief, that the mainstream history is correct, on me, isn't it? I mean, that belief is already forced upon people. Hundreds, if not thousands, of people, in both Croatia and in Serbia, have been punished for the things we can't know for certain they did, and thousands of people are being glorified as the good guys by the government, and we cannot be certain they indeed are. People are given that sense of certainty that it happened, and Facebook bans me for even mentioning the possibility that it's false.
I didn't mention that on my website, just so 000webhost doesn't also ban me.