DNA Proves Existence of a Designer

[Peebothuhlu]

At work.


Our conversation is currently about the 'How' of using our language.

You understand, yes?

Consider the statement:

"Doctor, I have been experiencing headaches since yesterday."

The patient just made a subjective statement.  How do you proceed?   Is their subjective evidence that warrants a conclusion?

---

 Uhm... no.

The patient is definately NOT making a subjective statement.

That they are stating that they feel pain can be demonstrated.

The feeling of pain is definately NOT subjective.

It can be measured. It can be detectied. It can be quantified.

Your analogy would seem to show that you do not understand.

Not at work.

---

---

 You keep posting these assertions. Each one becoming more disconnected from reality than the next/

Also... If your diety is pwerless to explain things to people when it's gettig them to write things down but, instead, has to wait another few centureis for people to discover things on their own.... Which those discoveries fly in the face of the very things said deity has previously told people to write down.

Makes your diety look completely inompetent, doesn't it?

Also... how' your squaring away your diety MAKING the evil which rebeled against its some how omnipotent, all powerful self?

Y'know, for the devil to be able to rebel against your diety... It has to be at least as powerful as said deity to succesfully rebel, right?

 Now you are making subjective statements.

What deity?  What explanations?  You're not even following the conversation.  That doesn't make any "deity" look incompetent.  It makes you look incompetent, but who cares, right?  It's just friendly conversation, so why elevate it to that.  No need for logical fallacies.  Just explain your position.  I asked for an example, but didn't get one.  I provided one, so you can either agree, disagree, assert a rebuttal, or do nothing.  What else is there?  If you have a rebuttal, then I'll consider it and form my own position "yay" or "nay" based on it.  It can be simple and doesn't have to turn into an argument.

Once you start shifting to other things, it doesn't serve a purpose.  "Deity" has nothing to do with this.  What you're doing is known as  the tu quoque fallacy, or whataboutism.

 I think CDFD47 can engage in converstaion quite well on their own.

I haven't shifted anything. How about you just concentrate on our conversation, hmmm?

Not at work.

---

The prophecies are accurate in the Bible.  The Bible is not a science book.

The devil thought he was equal and rebelled but was cast out of heaven and is spiritually here on Earth.

I'm not talking about anything 'Prophetic'.

I'm pointing out that your 'Three Onmi' deity created everything.

One of its creations was another entity which had the capacity to succesfully rebel against said omnipotence etc.

Think about that.

If your diety is the absolute 'Top of the heap' then how could anything possibly equal it?

How could anything else be strong enough to ignore your diety's dictates?

Not at work.

And the weird seeming ablity of the forum to combine posts of its own violition is another, new and slightly distrubing quality I've just noticed/discovered.