DNA Proves Existence of a Designer

[Amarok]

No the stats are arguable. 

No they really aren't and even if they were it's a fact that most scientists regardless of  religious affiliation accept evolution  and the those who don't are a small minority . Hell  your buddyEveria failed despite here attempt to use "big names " as if science is built on celebrity status and then only to show there ignorance or their dishonesty (seriously instead of reading the peer review literature meeting someone for lunch to explain complex scientific idea's and idiotically weaving conspiracies ) and even her supposed paper debunking macro evolution was written by two scientist\s who wholly accept the theory . 

See the stats I provided earlier in this thread. 

Rubbish 

Plus, it is almost the nature of that business to have an atheist religion almost following Darwin.

The nature of science ? it's history would disagree and science isn't a " business "let alone a religion and no one worships Darwin his idea's have been plenty questioned in mainstream science and some of his idea's even modified .

---

I haven't failed at any of those things.  The reason I am speaking of religion is because of the religious implications of the science.

You and your buddy Evera failed to do both .