(December 23, 2018 at 4:07 pm)Bucky Ball Wrote:Quote:No the stats are arguable. See the stats I provided earlier in this thread. Plus, it is almost the nature of that business to have an atheist religion almost following Darwin.
Atheism is not a religion ... IF you say it is, you have no respect for your own, comparing atheism to your own religion.
The stats are not arguable, and your argument is circular and you DEFEAT your own point. IF scientists reject your crap, than you have to STOP using the scientist argument.
Quote:Wrong. There was the fall of man. We are designed to live, decay, and die and be reborn into perfect bodies.
You have not one shred of evidence for any reality other than the one we know when things were "perfect".
If man does something, it's irrelevant to creation.
I do not not believe in god because of Darwin or evolution. I don't believe because I find it stupid.
All the science does is show I'm right.
And lets remember that before Darwin or the big bang theory or any of the other myriad things that show that god didn't do what god had always been assumed to have done and that the earth is not the age the bible said it was and that the exodus never happened etc. Even before all that, there were people who did not believe. And I think that the reason they didn't believe was because its obviously a bloody silly idea with nothing really going for it.
I don't just not believe in god, I find it a laughable idea.
You can fix ignorance, you can't fix stupid.
Tinkety Tonk and down with the Nazis.