RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
December 27, 2018 at 8:46 pm
(This post was last modified: December 27, 2018 at 8:54 pm by CDF47.)
(December 27, 2018 at 12:20 am)Peebo-Thuhlu Wrote: At work.
(December 27, 2018 at 12:02 am)CDF47 Wrote: There are plenty of biochemists, geneticists, other scientists that believe in a creator.
Yet more rhetoric and equivocation.
Prof Schweitzer is a well known professed Catholic who must constantly rebuke the Creationists who routinely lie and misrepresent her works.
What do they do to lie about her works?
(December 27, 2018 at 5:36 am)downbeatplumb Wrote:(December 26, 2018 at 11:09 pm)CDF47 Wrote: More evidence for the exodus:
https://www.christianheadlines.com/blog/...found.html
You probably missed the "may" bit in the article. It has not yet been investigated yet so it is not yet evidence for the exodus.
Perhaps that will change, but I think not.
Like all those "we found the ark" stories, they never found the ark. Its Christian click bait.
The ark may have been found by the CIA decades ago but I am not going to get into that debate. I saw the may bit in the article.
(December 27, 2018 at 10:00 am)Jörmungandr Wrote:(December 26, 2018 at 11:09 pm)CDF47 Wrote: I didn't say anything false. DNA has information bearing properties which cannot be explained by the atheist worldview. From there turn to theology.
You keep claiming this, but when asked for proof, you change the subject. What proof do you have that DNA couldn't have evolved through natural means and thus be explained by materialism. Evidence or shut the fuck up.
The evidence is that the information is not only extremely complex (like machine code but way more complex) it is also functional (like machine code). It encodes the construct of proteins in the cell. See the videos in my signature.
(December 27, 2018 at 10:34 am)pocaracas Wrote:(December 27, 2018 at 10:00 am)Jörmungandr Wrote: You keep claiming this, but when asked for proof, you change the subject. What proof do you have that DNA couldn't have evolved through natural means and thus be explained by materialism. Evidence or shut the fuck up.
I thought we couldn't prove a negative...
CDF's problem is that his argument is one of incredulity... Or lack of understanding of the mechanisms that drive what we call evolution.
I'd advise CDF to read an introductory book, perhaps Dawkins' Selfish Gene.
I appreciate the reference to the book. Not sure I will have time to read about it. I have a list of books I'd like to read and this would just be another one on a long list.
The LORD Exists: http://www.godandscience.org/
Intelligent Design (Short Video): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TVkdQhNdzHU
Intelligent Design (Longer Video): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tzj8iXiVDT8
Intelligent Design (Short Video): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TVkdQhNdzHU
Intelligent Design (Longer Video): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tzj8iXiVDT8