RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
December 29, 2018 at 2:18 pm
(This post was last modified: December 29, 2018 at 2:43 pm by Bucky Ball.)
Quote:Possible, so inconclusive. Don't need to go beyond that since you already did it for me.
Fail again Bozo.
So you also agree it's "possible". LOL
That means "could not have" is false.
NOT EVEN ONE WORD of discussion of the chemistry, or what's wrong with it.
The probability of the chemical reactions (in "possible") could be anything from .99 to "highly unlikely" ... you can't even address the probability.
You may find it not necessary to "go beyond", but the fact that it IS possible means a few who are actually interested in the facts (which clearly you are not), will look further.
Your failure here is evident to all.
As usual, you're WAY over your head here.
We do get that childish minds need "all or nothing", "black and white" thinking.
Every religion is true one way or another. It is true when understood metaphorically. But when it gets stuck in its own metaphors, interpreting them as facts, then you are in trouble. - Joseph Campbell 
Militant Atheist Commie Evolutionist

Militant Atheist Commie Evolutionist