(December 29, 2018 at 2:18 pm)Bucky Ball Wrote:Quote:Possible, so inconclusive. Don't need to go beyond that since you already did it for me.
Fail again Bozo.
So you also agree it's "possible". LOL
That means "could not have" is false.
NOT EVEN ONE WORD of discussion of the chemistry, or what's wrong with it.
The probability of the chemical reactions (in "possible") could be anything from .99 to "highly unlikely" ... you can't even address the probability.
You may find it not necessary to "go beyond", but the fact that it IS possible means a few who are actually interested in the facts (which clearly you are not), will look further.
Your failure here is evident to all.
As usual, you're WAY over your head here.
We do get that childish minds need "all or nothing", "black and white" thinking.
I didn't agree on anything. You stated such. Next.