(December 29, 2018 at 4:38 pm)T0 Th3 M4X Wrote:(December 29, 2018 at 3:48 pm)Bucky Ball Wrote: Sorry Bozo, you did agree.
If you claim it's not possible, you must say why, and what's wrong with the chemistry.
I agree that it's inconclusive as per your use of the word "possible." Beyond that I haven't asserted anything about the said subject.
Possible, probable, maybe, might be, could have, and the like are inconclusive assertions.
It's possible the monkey can learn some kung fu movies (inconclusive)
It's probable that it will rain tomorrow (inconclusive)
Maybe I will get the toy I wanted for Christmas (inconclusive)
He could have eaten the missing piece of chocolate pie (inconclusive)
It doesn't make any of them wrong in and of themselves, but it doesn't guarantee they are correct either.
The POINT went flying over your head.
He said "could not have" ... THAT was the point I was responding to, and to THAT you agreed.
Quote:Possible, probable, maybe, might be, could have, and the like are inconclusive assertions.
Exactly.
His conclusion was conclusive.
YOU agreed it was inconclusive. You DISAGREED with CDF47, and agreed with me.
Your attempted EVASION of the question put to you PROVES you are INCOMPETENT to discuss the CHEMISTRY.
Stop wasting our time.
Either say what's wrong with the chemistry, OR get back to talking to your invisible friends.
Every religion is true one way or another. It is true when understood metaphorically. But when it gets stuck in its own metaphors, interpreting them as facts, then you are in trouble. - Joseph Campbell 
Militant Atheist Commie Evolutionist

Militant Atheist Commie Evolutionist