DNA Proves Existence of a Designer

[T0 Th3 M4X]

 
I didn't necessarily agree or disagree with either of your assertions.  You tried to validate something that is inconclusive by stating it was conclusive and that nobody has invalidated this man's findings.  Okay, well maybe nobody tried?  Regardless, and even if someone has tried, you're discussing how something may (or may not) have arisen.  Just because the chemist has an idea that was a possibility doesn't make it conclusive as to how that subject had arisen.  His studies could be 100% valid in how he performed him and the results he found, but that doesn't make the results conclusive as an explanation for the past.

IMO (subjective), you're both "jumping the gun" with your assertions.  (My bad assertion is better than your bad assertion, so mine must be right)

What does that have to do with my understanding of chemistry?  Nothing!

Next.

Ah, a weasel at work.
CDF47 claimed his position that his code could not arise naturally was conclusive. 
Other than pointing out what he said, and that your position was NOT the same as his, I (personally) claimed nothing was conclusive. 
Thus you are a liar.  

The chemist does NOT say ANYTHING is conclusive, (only "possible) and YOU HAVE MISSED THE ENTIRE POINT. No one claimed the chemist claims "conclusive". 
CDF47 is the one claiming "conclusive" ... that position is WRONG as the "possible" chemistry has been demonstrated. 

I do get you *need* the page turned, ("next") as you cannot address the CHEMISTRY, (neither can CDF47). 

If either of you can refute Szostak's chemistry/biochemistry ... go ahead... otherwise, guess what ? 
You get to STFU. You are BOTH incompetent to say anything about the subject.

I agree with the chemist.  Not you, but only in part. You had one statement that was spot on. If you would stop running off on nonsensical tangents about things that people didn't say, then you might start to sound smart.  I have 0 problem with the chemists work or his observations.