DNA Proves Existence of a Designer

[T0 Th3 M4X]

Complexity in Molecular Recognition

It's not that anybody has trouble defining complexity, it's that pseudo Internet scientists claim it's "fake." 

Lie. "specified complexity" is fake.

But then again, anybody intelligent enough to Google "complexity" could figure out it's usage.

Sure. But that is not the claim made. Strawman.

Did he say "specified complexity" in his post?  Nope, I believe he didn't.  If your excuse for him wasn't so obvious it might've worked.

---

Complexity in Molecular Recognition

It's not that anybody has trouble defining complexity, it's that pseudo Internet scientists claim it's "fake."  But then again, anybody intelligent enough to Google "complexity" could figure out it's usage.

You are SO frightfully uneducated, you cannot even understand what you are reading. 
That article supports MY position. 
And still no boundary is proposed. 

"Though molecular recognition seems to be a complex and emergent property, a rationale for the diastereoselectivity of carbohydrate receptors was obtained by a combination of experimental data, free energy simulations and ab initio calculations."

Nope.  Nice try though.

If you understood what scientific study does and does not attempt to do, you would realize why it's hard to take you seriously.  As soon as you start digging at the "supernatural" and making negative assertions, you're starting to go in the other direction.  What you're obviously doing is taking the conclusions of others, who are actual scientists, and applying it to your belief that there is no God or even a need.