RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
January 1, 2019 at 5:52 am
(This post was last modified: January 1, 2019 at 5:55 am by T0 Th3 M4X.)
(January 1, 2019 at 5:24 am)Peebo-Thuhlu Wrote:(January 1, 2019 at 5:13 am)T0 Th3 M4X Wrote: "Complexity" became an issue for the atheists when people started suggesting it supported creation.
No... it became an issue when Creationists began using it because their normal, theistic, attemps at throwing religion into education was blocked and they hd to change tack.
To the efect that a lot of thei early, revamped, books were simply 'Copy/paste/edit with 'Creation' directly replaced with 'Inteligent design' and nothing else adjusted in the text.
(January 1, 2019 at 5:13 am)T0 Th3 M4X Wrote: So now, it's not only saying "no god", but "no complexity."
No... athiets, non thiests, arent' saying such things.
(January 1, 2019 at 5:13 am)T0 Th3 M4X Wrote: Your Average Joe isn't going to have a problem with the term or even a reasonably educated child,
Are we not doing phrasing any more? Really M4X.
(January 1, 2019 at 5:13 am)T0 Th3 M4X Wrote: ... and you can understand what it means without needing a dictionary.
Except people here on the forum keep explaining to yourself about;
1) What dictionaries are for.
2) How dictionaries are used
3) That words in general are descripters of ideas and hence their meanings change drastically given the context of the sentences they appear in.
(January 1, 2019 at 5:13 am)T0 Th3 M4X Wrote: ... and in a way that attempts to explain away belief in a Creator.Again, no one here is doing any such thing.
Thiets enter the forum and state their piece about their diety's. CDF47 inculded.
The Atheists and Notheists here abouts then, generally, respond with "Well.. what/where is your edivende (Physical etc) for such a thing?"
That people believe in all sorts of things as true is really with out any doubt.
I believe I'll go and have another beer.
Not at work.
No, sorry. Atheism and science don't go together. It's nonsense based on more nonsense. If your foundation is flawed, then what you perceive based on it will also have be flawed. We don't need anymore nutties telling people that the universe came from nothing, when science has shown us that no natural process creates, generates, or forms something from nothing. It's ridiculous at its core. Just as organic life doesn't randomly generate by some accident from inorganic matter, then gain in complexity over billions of years. More nonsense concocted by nutty atheists.
Also, you don't tell me what dictionaries are for. I can't make up my mind for myself. If you want to go through life being a puppet and having everybody tell you what to think, then go for it.
(January 1, 2019 at 5:44 am)Amarok Wrote:(January 1, 2019 at 5:13 am)T0 Th3 M4X Wrote: "Complexity" became an issue for the atheists when people started suggesting it supported creation. So now, it's not only saying "no god", but "no complexity." Your Average Joe isn't going to have a problem with the term or even a reasonably educated child, and you can understand what it means without needing a dictionary. Even a good number of atheists use the term, but you'll most likely see it applied differently, and in a way that attempts to explain away belief in a Creator.And that's and absurd statement
(January 1, 2019 at 5:24 am)Peebo-Thuhlu Wrote: No... it became an issue when Creationists began using it because their normal, theistic, attemps at throwing religion into education was blocked and they hd to change tack.Oh no peebo it's just the evil atheists denying creationism .It's got nothing to do with the fact ID advocates fail at defining what they mean .
To the efect that a lot of thei early, revamped, books were simply 'Copy/paste/edit with 'Creation' directly replaced with 'Inteligent design' and nothing else adjusted in the text.
No... athiets, non thiests, arent' saying such things.
Are we not doing phrasing any more? Really M4X.
Except people here on the forum keep explaining to yourself about;
1) What dictionaries are for.
2) How dictionaries are used
3) That words in general are descripters of ideas and hence their meanings change drastically given the context of the sentences they appear in.
Again, no one here is doing any such thing.
Thiets enter the forum and state their piece about their diety's. CDF47 inculded.
The Atheists and Notheists here abouts then, generally, respond with "Well.. what/where is your edivende (Physical etc) for such a thing?"
That people believe in all sorts of things as true is really with out any doubt.
I believe I'll go and have another beer.
Not at work.
Nah, just get sick of the crybaby atheists who try to censor books and other media. Let people explore and think for themselves.