(January 1, 2019 at 7:03 am)T0 Th3 M4X Wrote:(January 1, 2019 at 6:04 am)Amarok Wrote: So a bunch of arguments from credulity and straw men very good
So a bunch of BS creationist whining and conspiracy tripe
Nope. Reality. Atheist nonsense. They don't want to believe something so they start making things up.
"Someone says "creation" and "complexity" together, so now we don't accept the term "complexity."
(January 1, 2019 at 6:38 am)downbeatplumb Wrote: What is the process that this intelligent designer used to make the DNA?
What was the process and where did it get the stuff?
Where is the evidence for the designing that cannot be accounted for by other means?
To me this is the "stuff exists therefore god" argument, which seems to be all they have now.
- It says in Genesis 1.
- If God made the "stuff", then why would God need "the stuff" to make "the stuff." (Your question isn't rationale)
- Well let's see you account for it by another means. Can't wait to hear this. Regardless, you can have two routes that could potentially lead to the same place. Suggesting something new doesn't mean it replaces what is already known.
If you want to indicate it all happened naturally, then why should I disregard science and assume your idea is better? Something from nothing? Organic from inorganic, then gaining in complexity? Is there are YT video that demonstrates no matter and *boom* matter. If you have a link to one, I would love to see it.
So do you have a non-silly idea of how this designer thing could have been done or are you just going to say "magic man must have done it" again then not show your working.
All you seem to do is pick at evolution while not putting anything FOR your side.
You can fix ignorance, you can't fix stupid.
Tinkety Tonk and down with the Nazis.