DNA Proves Existence of a Designer

[Amarok]

So a bunch of arguments from credulity and straw men very good


So a bunch of BS creationist whining and conspiracy tripe

Nope. Reality. Atheist nonsense.  They don't want to believe something so they start making things up.

"Someone says "creation" and "complexity" together, so now we don't accept the term "complexity."

Nope Creationist nonsense . All credulity and straw men because they don't want to accept something .

And the second statement is nonsense and is nothing but creationist conspiracy tripe

---

- If God made the "stuff", then why would God need "the stuff" to make "the stuff."   (Your question isn't rationale)

So no answer then 

- Well let's see you account for it by another means.  Can't wait to hear this.  Regardless, you can have two routes that could potentially lead to the same place.  Suggesting something new doesn't mean it replaces what is already known.

Consider yours isn't even a way ...

If you want to indicate it all happened naturally, then why should I disregard science and assume your idea is better?  Something from nothing?  Organic from inorganic, then gaining in complexity?  Is there are YT video that demonstrates no matter and *boom* matter.  If you have a link to one, I would love to see it

So the same bunch of credulity and straw men and arguments from ignorance  (and assertion that science supports this)

---

Nope. Reality. Atheist nonsense.  They don't want to believe something so they start making things up.

"Someone says "creation" and "complexity" together, so now we don't accept the term "complexity."

---

- It says in Genesis 1.
- If God made the "stuff", then why would God need "the stuff" to make "the stuff."   (Your question isn't rationale)
- Well let's see you account for it by another means.  Can't wait to hear this.  Regardless, you can have two routes that could potentially lead to the same place.  Suggesting something new doesn't mean it replaces what is already known.

If you want to indicate it all happened naturally, then why should I disregard science and assume your idea is better?  Something from nothing?  Organic from inorganic, then gaining in complexity?  Is there are YT video that demonstrates no matter and *boom* matter.  If you have a link to one, I would love to see it.

So do you have a non-silly idea of how this designer thing could have been done or are you just going to say "magic man must have done it" again then not show your working.

All you seem to do is pick at evolution while not putting anything FOR your side.

Well don't you know that if you attack x that makes y true 

But small criticism Matter formation and Abiogenisis are not evolution don't fall into the creationist trap .