RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
January 1, 2019 at 3:14 pm
(This post was last modified: January 1, 2019 at 3:33 pm by Bucky Ball.)
Quote:You don't have authority to tell me such and you certainly haven't been reliable thus far, so I'll just disqualify you instead. If you don't want to believe something has authority or is reliable, then that's your choice, but to others it's tried and true, and no need for your approval.
LOL.
I actually do have that authority, gramps. I have an advanced degree in it.
The best archaeologists have debunked your old book.
STILL no definition of a god. STILL no definition of "complexity" ... yeah. Pretty much a total fail.
The debate is NOT about what YOU find authoritative. If you expect others to accept your source as authoritative, you DO have to prove its reliability and authority.
You failed to do that. You know SO little about debate, you don't even get why it's necessary.
What the hell are you even doing here ... you're SO BAD at this.
This is an ATHEIST community. The fact that "others" find your old book by ignorant goat-herders to be reliable is irrelevant.
Harry Potter is "tried and true". You're REALLY bad at this debate thing. Quite the embarrassing amateur. Please stop making a fool of yourself.
"Others" found "Mein Kampf" to be "tried and true" ... and you have the balls to say anything about ";logical fallacies". LOL
Too bad old troll. You've shown your true colors.
YOU are unable to debunk even ONE THING said in the following video ... which the archaeologists put together.
Every religion is true one way or another. It is true when understood metaphorically. But when it gets stuck in its own metaphors, interpreting them as facts, then you are in trouble. - Joseph Campbell 
Militant Atheist Commie Evolutionist

Militant Atheist Commie Evolutionist