DNA Proves Existence of a Designer

[CDF47]

This was a scientific thread with religious implications.  Then I was asked religious questions which is understandable.

lol

That badge would make him grossly overqualified to be a creation "scientist"

LOL

---

I wonder how many geneticists, biologists, engineers, archaeologists, and theologians are in this thread.  I wonder how many have PhDs in their field.  You guys make it as if you do not hold one of these credentials then your opinion doesn't matter which is not true.

---

What are your credentials?

Physics engineer with a PhD on fusion plasma diagnostics, here!  
Your turn.

Very nice.  Great work.  I'm a mechanical engineer with a BSME.  I have 15 years experience as a design engineer, team leader, and systems engineer for the US government as a civilian.

---

That badge would make him grossly overqualified to be a creation "scientist"

You do realize you just insulted yourself and your nutty friends.

It was funny.  I don't have a problem with a little banter being that I am in a atheist forum.

---

My point was things are either designed or not.  Those are the only two options.  Anything not designed, I consider a blind un-directed process.

Well, considering them such is your first mistake.  I've already granted that it was either designed or it wasn't.  That takes no effort to come to that conclusion.  The question is what evidence do you have that it couldn't have resulted from similarly natural processes.  Your previous complaint was that because they are undirected -- they're not -- that they couldn't produce the functional information in DNA.  I pointed out that such processes do create functional information, so that reason alone doesn't justify believing that such processes cannot produce DNA or functional information.  So you still haven't provided reasons or evidence that shows that such processes could not produce the functional information in DNA.  Until you provide something that does show this, your belief that it cannot do so rests on nothing, and your belief that it cannot do so is irrational.  If that belief is irrational, and your argument for God rests on that, then your argument for God is irrational.  You have given us no reason to believe God exists and every reason to dismiss your belief that DNA proves that he exists.  You're going to have to do better than that.

This is about the umpteenth time I've asked you and so far you've provided squat.  Do you have evidence or reasons which show that DNA could not have been produced by natural processes?

Yes, DNA is a functional code that programs an assembly line construction of amino acids to parts which are then formed into proteins by a barrel shaped machine.  The protein construct is then transported to the cell to perform its function.  This is manufacturing engineering 101 at a nano-scale.  This did not come about by chance alone which is all natural causes are.