DNA Proves Existence of a Designer

[Amarok]

You are inadequate and boring.  You state conclusions based on what real scientists have said, then act like your psuedo-conclusion was based on their observations, when they said something completely different.  Seems to be a trend with you.  I could understand it 1 or 2 times by mistake, but when it's several times a week it gets to be tedious listening to your nonsense.

Now we're back at the dictionary being inadequate to provide definitions.  Of course the real issue at hand has been obvious.  You don't want to accept the definition because you want to assert that something can't be defined.  Well guess what, it has been defined.  Your opinion of inadequacy has more to do with you than it.

If you are in a library and said to a child, "go find me a definition of 'star'", they will likely go to a dictionary and find a definition for it.  They're not wrong, because it's common sense to use a dictionary for definitions.  That is one of its functions.  Now we have someone who is presumably a grown adult, or at least high school level saying "no dictionary."   Nope sorry, that doesn't fly with the sane.

The definition is inadequate sorry