RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
January 3, 2019 at 10:30 am
(This post was last modified: January 3, 2019 at 10:42 am by T0 Th3 M4X.)
(January 3, 2019 at 2:50 am)Amarok Wrote:(January 3, 2019 at 2:23 am)T0 Th3 M4X Wrote: So my definition isn't good enough, but you have no definition at all because it's not your job. But I suppose it's your job to tell me I need to provide a different definition? No thanks. Not interested. I'll stick with M-W if you don't have anything better for me to consider.So you stick with the antiquate definition then try and push it back on me . When that fails you insist on the inadequate definition . Then demand I give a better one..Lol right
Sorry, but my definition is adequate, and seeing as to how you can't even come up with one, then you're really not in a position to critique me.
What definition are you proposing instead? Why is it better and why should I accept it as such? If you don't want to provide anything, then no reason for me to reconsider.
(January 3, 2019 at 5:39 am)downbeatplumb Wrote: I can see now tothemax's argument is "I don't understand and shall replace my ignorance with the word god"
Nope, sorry. If I wanted to replace "ignorance" then I would just swap it out for "downbeatplumb."
You keep wanting to tell me I'm wrong, but no explanation or demonstration as to what makes your view right. That is ignorance.
If you have nothing, and you haven't for almost a week now, then there's nothing to consider.
(January 3, 2019 at 9:00 am)Abaddon_ire Wrote:(January 3, 2019 at 2:23 am)T0 Th3 M4X Wrote: So my definition isn't good enough, but you have no definition at all because it's not your job. But I suppose it's your job to tell me I need to provide a different definition? No thanks. Not interested. I'll stick with M-W if you don't have anything better for me to consider.
If you want to make an argument then make it. Don't dishonestly attempt to goad others into making your argument for you.
(January 3, 2019 at 2:23 am)T0 Th3 M4X Wrote: So my definition isn't good enough, but you have no definition at all because it's not your job. But I suppose it's your job to tell me I need to provide a different definition? No thanks. Not interested. I'll stick with M-W if you don't have anything better for me to consider.
If you want to make an argument then make it. Don't dishonestly attempt to goad others into making your argument for you.
Same goes for you. Been waiting on your argument for days. Haven't tried to goad anybody, but tell whatever lies you like. I don't mind atheists but the ones who have nothing, offer nothing, and whine when others do are boring.
About a month here and still no evidence for nothing coming from something, or inorganic matter turning into anything organic. I'm guessing there won't be anything in another month either.
