RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
January 3, 2019 at 3:03 pm
(This post was last modified: January 3, 2019 at 3:14 pm by T0 Th3 M4X.)
(January 3, 2019 at 1:05 pm)Amarok Wrote:Quote:Sorry, but my definition is adequate, and seeing as to how you can't even come up with one, then you're really not in a position to critique me.For what proposing no it's not and again i'm not the one who has to define it .
What definition are you proposing instead? Why is it better and why should I accept it as such? If you don't want to provide anything, then no reason for me to reconsider.
Cool. So no need for any other definitions then.
(January 3, 2019 at 10:53 am)downbeatplumb Wrote:(January 3, 2019 at 10:30 am)T0 Th3 M4X Wrote:
Nope, sorry. If I wanted to replace "ignorance" then I would just swap it out for "downbeatplumb."
You keep wanting to tell me I'm wrong, but no explanation or demonstration as to what makes your view right. That is ignorance.
If you have nothing, and you haven't for almost a week now, then there's nothing to consider.
You have literally given me nothing in return for all the explanations I and others have given, I have asked time and time again for a description of a god and how god did these things and you have given nothing.
Let me say again that to say god did something is not enough if you provide no evidence for that or even a good definition of what a god is.
As far as I can see god is just a cover for you not knowing something.
You don't know, therefore god.
You produce nothing, and you have nothing. I know therefore "God", you don't know therefore "atheism", along with things popping out of nowhere, and living things coming from nonliving. Congrats, that's just brilliant. Your whole premise is based on the optical outcome that some day you will die and become tasty worm food. Wow, now that's something to look forward to. One thing is true, we all find what we seek in one form or another. Good luck.
