DNA Proves Existence of a Designer

[CDF47]

Yes, DNA is a functional code that programs an assembly line construction of amino acids to parts which are then formed into proteins by a barrel shaped machine.  The protein construct is then transported to the cell to perform its function.  This is manufacturing engineering 101 at a nano-scale.  This did not come about by chance alone which is all natural causes are.

That's exactly correct. 
It did not happen "by chance". 
As was demonstrated in the Szostack video, (which you were unable to even discuss), "chance " was not how it happened. 
Once the evolutionary process has begun, (which wasn't even "chance"), the next step is not "chance. 
You clearly understand nothing about chemistry, physics, or evolution. 
https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn1...is-random/
https://www.patheos.com/blogs/daylightat...nt-chance/
https://evolution.berkeley.edu/evolibrar...ns_faq.php

---

-It's not about "requiring", which seems to be the source of your confusion.  Either something "is" or it "isn't"  If it exists independently, then nothing else is needed.
- Already provided you a definition from M-W dictionary.  If you don't accept it, then your problem not mine.
-I did the same things I still do.  Adding one thing doesn't mean I change everything else.  Still read, write, publish, spend time with my dogs and cats, video games, help out my neighbors, etc... 

Always the deflection and obfuscation. The definition you provided was inadequate, and did not address the questions asked of you. 
It almost makes one think you don't even understand the questions. *That* couldn't be, no could it ?
LMAO
You're a total fraud. 
I've known it since you first response to my post where you blustered about a "string of logical fallacies" which you couldn't even name.

Something is either designed or is not.  That is my point.  Natural selection is an un-designed process, thus, un-directed.

---

I can see now tothemax's argument is "I don't understand and shall replace my ignorance with the word god"

Theists of every religion, bar none, worldwide, depending on individual, can and are capable of accepting science, but only and up until it conflicts with their beliefs, and that is where the cherry picking begins.

There is no issue with science.  The only issue is in a common ancestry which is not supported well by evidence.

---

The Maximus:
You are special. No matter what you ever hear me say, I will never cease to believe that, and I mean that in the nicest conceivable way possible.

I think you are misunderstanding my point. Sure, people are special to each other. Mothers, fathers, children, significant others, friends, all mean something to each other. However, humans as a whole, mean very little. One day they will be extinct, and the universe will continue on as if they never were.

Good thing the Creator gave us proof of His existence in the cell.