(January 4, 2019 at 3:51 am)Amarok Wrote:(January 3, 2019 at 8:54 pm)T0 Th3 M4X Wrote: You provided no definition. Nothing antiquate, nothing defined with you as the subject interpreting. Just nothing. As such, what responsibility and authority do you have to demand any response from me?Again I don't need to as I'm not the one defending your position you are and your definition is antiquate to defend it . And it's your choice to dodge giving one but it says a great deal about your position .
Quote:Yet the video you posted suggested that very thing within it's first statement in the first 15 seconds. "Universal Common Decent" + "Every living thing on earth is related to every living thing on earth" It even went on to discuss the "split", so that would make the chimp your cousin, aunt, or uncle. (because if not, it would be a parent) So dependent on how that chain supposedly branched off it would determine the relationship. If Bobo isn't your uncle, your cousin would be Bobo.Yeah that's not what it says and that's not how common descent works but nice try
Beaten again by your own source.
Quote:Because that's what makes it life.Nope actions make it life weither those actions have any ultimate purpose is aside the fact
If I never had purpose, I would never have any reason to do anything. I wouldn't brush my teeth, play with my dogs, go to the gym, climb a mountain, jump out of a plane, or do anything else. I would just sit around and blink my eyes all day for no apparent reason.
What position do you think I'm defending? I don't feel like I'm on some hot seat to be defensive, so feel free to explain.