Evidence for a god. Do you have any ?

[T0 Th3 M4X]

Not going to nitpick over this.  We can remove the term "flood" and say "watery environment that buries."

There are other watery environments - yep, but they don't normally bury dead animals and such rapidly in sediment.

Actually, they do.  No matter, I accept your retraction.

Boru

The whole point wasn't to nitpick over water.  It was to highlight how the process happens.  You have something buries, it exchanges molecules with sediment, and forms a cast.  The cast is the fossil.  Things like flooding are frequently associated it because a flood has the ability to move something very rapidly, and bury it in sediment.  It's not the only way though.  It can happen in places like volcanoes.

---

Not what I said. Try reading it again.

Sure. It didn'tget better  on a second reading.

You are claiming that miraculous events are not possible and are possible.

This thread is about EVIDENCE for a god. So far you have presented none because you have none.

---

Ummm, nope.  Fossilization is almost always a result of flooding. 

Wrong. Do you know anything?

Fossilization is actually a rarity nowadays.

Wrong. Fossilization occurs at the same rate it always has.

  If you see an animal hit by a car on, or alongside, a road it will just decompose over time. 

LOL, just proved yourself wrong.

Now if a road is rapidly flooded and there was an animal there, the chances will be increased of that animal being fossilized since it can rapidly bury that animal as well as cut off oxygen from reaching the corpse. 

As usual you got some facts correct and promptly borked them. For whatever reason, you seem to be utterly unable to grok "SCALE". Doesn't seem to matter whether it is time, distance, whatever. You simply cannot get your head around even simple things like perspective.

Over time that sediment it's locked away in with replicate it by exchanging molecules with it so that you have a fossil.

That is not even a sentence. But what may one expect from the religiously educated.

I said "extreme flooding" including over mountains and hills.  That's my position on it.  Why do you keep insisting that I say something you want me to say?  I already answered your question 3-4 different ways now with the same answer.  What do you think about said flooding during the "Bronze Age" as you stated?

You have been dancing around this issue for some time. And I know why. Your options are few at this point. Has the cock crowed yet?

How did I prove myself wrong?  Guessing you don't have a clue, but I'll be glad to listen anyway.