(January 13, 2019 at 6:47 pm)T0 Th3 M4X Wrote: Not going to nitpick over this. We can remove the term "flood" and say "watery environment that buries."
There are other watery environments - yep, but they don't normally bury dead animals and such rapidly in sediment.
Dude. Have you ever swam in a lake? Lakes are --newsflash!-- frikkin' everywhere. Another fact about lakes: many of them have muddy bottoms.
Here's a fact about animals: they like to hang around bodies of water. Do the math. Animals commonly die and/or are hunted around bodies of water.
Let me cut to the chase. Modern science wholly rejects the idea that fossils were created a mere few thousand years ago during a worldwide flood. Where do you stand on the issue? You seem a like you're dodging the issue a little bit, man. Though, admittedly, I'm a bit behind the curve in this thread.
(BTW, I'm not trying to nitpick. I'm just debating the issue. I noticed that another user hit you with a "citation needed" in another thread. I wasn't trying to pile on there or anything. It was mere coincidence that I used the same phrase to request sources from you. Sorry if you're feeling like a human bibliography.)