(January 14, 2019 at 6:46 am)pocaracas Wrote:(January 14, 2019 at 4:58 am)T0 Th3 M4X Wrote: Some things are understood even though they're not exact. Sometimes you need to be exact.
I already answered the sufficiency question. Humans have the potential for error. It doesn't mean we have to err in something, but why increase your chances if you don't know something? I think it's good that it's not sufficient, because it can drive us to make it more sufficient by learning. Sometimes that requires making mistakes (trial and error).
So... you're saying that human intelligence is, somehow, incrementally, increasing in capability, huh?
It's not static.