DNA Proves Existence of a Designer

[T0 Th3 M4X]

When I believe something, I try to do it without my bias or the bias of others.  When I can achieve that, then I nod my head up and down.  If there is bias, then I move my head left to right, shrug my shoulders, and say "I dunno."  It's not that I don't accept the possibility of said, it's that I don't accept it as the only possible conclusion.  Or course that is what "I" choose as my standard for understanding the world around me.  If others have a different standard, then that is their choice and not trying to tell them they have to believe otherwise.

Would you like to do the maths yourself?
Or would you be happy with reading how it's done in a book or a published scientific paper?

I've read numerous scientific papers on it in the past, and I'm happy to read scientific papers on it today.  The thing is, it's not just one theory anymore.  It's multiple theories that keep changing.   That's the problem with human bias.  You'll get an increasing number of people saying they have a better explanation.  Quite honestly, I appreciate the beauty of personal opinion/bias, but I don't have time to visit everybody's personal take on something.   There are many things out there more relevant to my own life, so that's what I try to focus more of my precious time on.

I'm happy to consider the math you're suggesting, but please provide something that is conclusive if you choose to do so.  So far I've gotten two different numbers. 85 percent and 95 percent.  A 10 percent disparity in the universe's matter is quite a disparity.  Also, please keep in mind that I'm not a mathematician.  In college I took statistics and classes related to research methods, and as such I understand those aspect of applied mathematics.  If the math gets too complex, I may have to defer to a professional who can analyze it more readily.

---

  .... Either put up or shut up if you claim something exists.

Thread title:

DNA Proves Existence of a Designer

...but u wont fucking shut up, troll, will ya?

I've provided my position on said.  I'm happy to discuss it further on a point-by-point basis, but no reason to go back and share unless you have a reason I should do so.  I would think it would be "trolling" if I were redundant in sharing my position when it has already been established. 

So do you have a specific question or are you in reality the one who is trolling and needs to shut up due to not not offering up anything of value, or do you simply not understand what it means to troll?