DNA Proves Existence of a Designer

[T0 Th3 M4X]

I read the link for the CDM Model, but these problems still remain -

- It asserts that the CMB is evidence of the BBT, but actually it was the problem.  They didn't find what they predicted (smooth), but rather found something else (lumpy).  That's just putting it simply of course.
- As such, they're using dark matter to prove the BBT without first proving dark matter exists.
- If you can't show it exists, then it makes no sense to say it makes up almost the entire universe.
- This model doesn't state a point, but a rapid appearance.  The original model was a point.  They couldn't establish a point, so I can see why they swapped it out.  But this actually favors creation.

The whole thing doesn't prove, but rather assumes.  When it can prove rather than assume, then it's worth serious consideration.

By your standards, nothing can prove creation either, so creation is also not worth serious consideration. Correct?

The existence of a CMB at all is evidence of the Big Bang.
That the CMB is "lumpy" is evidence that some directions seem to be preferred... what caused that, when the observable cosmos cannot account for it, is what is being labeled as Dark matter and/or dark energy.
The thing is there and its effects are observable.

Just like the electrons are flowing along under your fingertips when you type on your keyboard or smartphone, you can't really see the individual electrons, but you can see their effect.

I haven't set out to prove creation.  We are talking about the "non-observable" past.  But what you shared suggested that "time" and "space" were suddenly just there as an expanse rather than a point.  That's pretty much what the verse in the Bible says as well.  In the beginning (time), God created the heavens and the earth (space).

Agreed there is a "lumpy effect"m which is why someone asserted "dark matter."


Again, I don't have a problem with saying there's dark matter.  But if I can't directly observe it, it just exists as a possibility (to me).