Morality

[Agnostico]

the best thing to do is separate them from the bigoted, homophobic, and backwards nonsense

The backwards nonsense like what, homosexuality? Is that all?  U call people homophobes if they don't agree with your opinion. That is the definition of bigoted.

Homosexuality and gender dysphoria can do what they like. MYOB. But they dont. Their doing their gay parades with their banners, publicly displaying it.
Their mental disorders like necrophiliality and pedosexuality.
Im a strong believer in not exposing children to sexual content, information and material of any kind. Especially not encouraging them to become fags and trannies.

Our "wester" values come from a myriad of sources

"A miryad" I agree. Protestants, Catholics, Anglicans, Orthodoxies and many more Christians.
Im not saying Christianity invented morality. Im saying the values and laws of the European kingdoms are founded on Christianity.

In Britain, Henry the 8th refutes any claim that Christianity wasn't the moral foundation.
Then the formation of all these Eurpean kingdoms all under the Catholic church. And the formation of these colonies in the new world, all under the Catholic church.

And it goes all the way back to the start of written history. Theres always a religion of some kind. Judhaism, Confucianism, etc.
Why is that? The "need for a sky daddy" argument is super simplistic. it really lacks thought.

The thought that religion was a huge lie required for humans to transition from instinctive cave man to civilized man, really pisses some people off.
That its all a big fat lie. Just like the money analogy given by Hurari. Its all based on a false reality. Possibly.


Purple represents Christianity

I said "Fact... Atheism has no objective morals which people can refer to"
What i meant is Atheism has no documented morals to refer to. No doctrine or scriptures  to adhere to. No collective agreement.
For example u label anyone a homophobe who doesn't agree with u. There are atheists who don't agree with u.
At least the Hindu, Christians, Muslims, all of them can look at their scripture and say this is an improper way for humanity to procreate.

But the difference between uncompassionate or an immoral atheist, and immoral christian, is that immoral atheist can deny that they have any obligations to be moral, or to be good person, where as the uncompassionate or immoral christian can’t deny it. He may try to justify that he’s not living immorally, or uncompassionately, but he has to acknowledge his obligations to live as such. And from that it becomes a task of revealing to them, that they are lying to themselves, that they’re not living compassionately, or morally

Ive been following ur thoughts Acrobat and despite the hostile nature of everyone toward you I follow ur logic on most things and find it refreshing.
Where can I find ur definition of ur "transcendent moral reality" theory anyway so I can better understand it?