(January 17, 2019 at 6:22 pm)CDF47 Wrote:Nope. It doesn't matter how many times you keep referring to the videos in your sig. All they do is use deceptive language to describe chemical processes. And you fell for it. On top of that the use half truths and full on lies and omissions. For example, they start off with Francis Crick as though he was special. In fact Crick was the least productive member of a team. You have no clue that there was a team, that Crick was mostly baggage, who the other members of the team were and why exactly one was excluded. You also don't know that the team with taildragger Crick was in a race against Pauling who was also close. You don't know anything much.(January 15, 2019 at 7:01 pm)Abaddon_ire Wrote: Nope. You keep lying about DNA is machine code when it isn't.
Disagree? The go ahead and provide the op-code/operand structure of DNA, Or the mnemonic/symbolic structure of DNA, or the function limits or fork/join functions, anything.
You can't because you have no clue what those are.
My point was it operates like a mini-manufacturing plant, which it clearly does. Again, see the videos in my signature.
The point is that your videos are dishonest from their very outset.