(January 22, 2019 at 2:47 am)Anomalocaris Wrote:(January 22, 2019 at 2:39 am)pocaracas Wrote: For the past 100+ years of scientific research, perhaps it is better to start here: https://www.nature.com/nature/history/index.html
You might need to pay them to access everything, but such is the nature of the service they provide.
I know that journal covers far more than just evolution... But I am well aware that, in order to understand one field of science, you need to have some awareness of what goes on in the other fields... You do want to get as compete a picture as possible, right?
A blind man with no interest whatsoever in seeing disingenuously tells others to paint a photo realistic painting of reality to disprove what he imagines the world to be like. You think he will acquire sight now for the purpose of actually using the photo library of the world you recommend as a more reliable indicator of the apparence of reality?
It's a wild goose chase. You can't provide what you claim, so tell someone to go look in some source loaded with an incredible amount of info. Seen that dishonest tactics by many. Either you have what you claim or you don't. So far it looks like you don't.