Morality

[Brian37]

OFC, it's an evaluation.  No matter what the ontological status of the object may be, the practice of the subject remains that.  Moral facts are the thing, morality is an evaluation of relationships by reference to the thing.

I'm not sure why you're replying for Brian, you seem to be a non-natural moral realist, while Brian seems to be arguing for moral relativism.

Holy bolt of lighting Thor! 

Please stop.

I am NOT arguing for "moral relativism" or "moral absolutism". I am simply saying nature is not a factory product made by Willy Wonka.

You are the one insisting that a sky wizard did all this.

Saying that tornados exist does not mean I want one flattening my house or killing me. Saying hurricanes happen, of which one I had to get out of it's path last year, does not mean I wanted to come back to find a flattened or flooded house. Human behaviors, good or bad, do not need super natural answers to explain either.

Again go back and look at the video of the cat defending the kid. If God were required to defend the kid, then the cat should have the same ability to read the bible too. But somehow it managed to defend the kid without the ability of human language. I still get joy out of seeing videos like that, but the only difference is I don't assign what that cat, did, or what humans do like that, to magic or super cognitions.